Lenny's Polls

How has AI changed how you feel about your job?

Most people feel better about their jobs with the rise of AI, but at the same time, a majority feel less secure in their role.

~350 responses Feb 12 – Feb 19, 2026
The tl;dr
How has AI changed how you feel about your job?
1 = much worse, 5 = much better
5%
22%
12%
36%
26%
Much worse
Somewhat worse
No real change
Somewhat better
Much better
Much worse Much better
What the data shows

Has AI changed how secure you feel in your role?

Much less secure
61
20%
Somewhat less secure
102
34%
No change
54
18%
Somewhat more secure
59
20%
Much more secure
21
7%

Has AI changed how fulfilling your work feels?

Much less fulfilling
19
6%
Somewhat less fulfilling
33
11%
No change
77
26%
Somewhat more fulfilling
104
35%
Much more fulfilling
63
21%
56% say work is more fulfilling, but 55% feel less secure. Many respondents reported both: they find the work more interesting and engaging, while simultaneously feeling less certain about their long-term role. AI is making daily work better and career prospects scarier at the same time. If you're a leader, the trick is going to be continuing to enable AI-native workflows while assuaging concerns over long-term prospects, the anxiety, and the uncertainty in long-term role trajectories.

Which of these describe how AI has changed your workload?

More productive
184
62%
More work
111
37%
More pulled in
144
48%
Less work
33
11%
No real change
19
6%
Productivity has gone up, but workload hasn't gone down. 62% say they're more productive, but only 11% say their workload has actually decreased. Part of this is organizational: 37% say they're doing their old work plus new AI responsibilities on top. But part of it is self-inflicted: 49% say they're spending extra time experimenting with AI or keeping up with the pace of change, not because they have to, but because the work is compelling or because falling behind feels risky. Both ICs and leaders should shift some focus to calibrated prioritization, to figure out how AI-human collaboration, new capabilities, and a markedly different pace of work should impact expectations and workload. Also, some things haven't changed, like the risk of burnout while working at a blazingly rapid cadence.

Which best describes the primary way AI adoption is happening at your company?

Top-down, supportive
117
38%
Top-down, restrictive
48
16%
Bottom-up, organic
55
18%
Messy middle
78
26%
Not really happening
7
2%
Only about a third of companies are providing coordinated AI support. 38% describe their company's AI adoption as "top-down, supportive." The remaining 62% split among restrictive mandates (16%), bottom-up individual experimentation (18%), and a messy middle with energy but no direction (26%). We can't say from this data whether workers want more leadership involvement, but we can see that most companies are still in an uncoordinated situation when it comes to AI.
More patterns
Enterprise companies (5,001+) are the one segment where AI has barely moved job sentiment. Their average is 3.08, essentially "no real change," a full point below the smallest companies (4.11 for 2-10 employees). Larger companies are more likely to fall into the "restrictive" or "messy middle" adoption categories. If you're running AI strategy at a large org, this is a leading indicator of whether your rollout is working for people or just checking a box.
Long-tenured employees feel the most positive. Mid-tenure employees feel the least. People with 11+ years at their company average 4.0/5, the highest of any tenure group. Those with 3-5 years average 3.35/5, the lowest. Long-tenured employees have deep institutional knowledge that AI amplifies. Mid-tenure employees may sit in a more exposed spot: experienced enough to have an established workflow, not senior enough to direct AI strategy.
Themes

Themes from open-ended responses. Click any to see quotes.

What feels better

What feels worse

Who responded

Company size

11–50
52
19.9%
51–250
50
19.2%
5,001+
50
19.2%
251–1,000
39
14.9%
1,001–5,000
31
11.9%
2–10
28
10.7%
Just me
11
4.2%

Tenure in current role

3–5 years
84
32.2%
1–2 years
80
30.7%
Less than 1 year
57
21.8%
6–10 years
27
10.3%
11+ years
13
5.0%

Role level

IC
162
62.1%
VP / Director / Head
47
18.0%
Founder / C-suite
37
14.2%
Group PM / Manager
15
5.7%